<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Version 1.0.2 of ColorMunki now available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/05/version-102-of-colormunki-now-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/05/version-102-of-colormunki-now-available/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:12:27 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mjbauer</title>
		<link>http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/05/version-102-of-colormunki-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>mjbauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 18:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.printerville.net/?p=71#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I am glad to see others felt this way. I sent mine back to Amazon. I wished this would have worked as it was easy to use but the results were poor

I profiled my iMac and two printers; an Epson 2200 and an Epson 3800, the results were very poor, much worse thn using the provided profiles, especially the 3800.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad to see others felt this way. I sent mine back to Amazon. I wished this would have worked as it was easy to use but the results were poor</p>
<p>I profiled my iMac and two printers; an Epson 2200 and an Epson 3800, the results were very poor, much worse thn using the provided profiles, especially the 3800.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Camp</title>
		<link>http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/05/version-102-of-colormunki-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Camp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.printerville.net/?p=71#comment-30</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve retested 1.0.2 on two printers. The memory leak appears to be fixed and I only had one or two errors reading patches, so that is an improvement.

The profiles still have the same yellow-green tint for skin tones which makes them mostly useless for me.

I was thinking I might do some more testing, but I just can&#039;t justify wasting any more of my time fiddling with this thing. I&#039;m getting a refund.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve retested 1.0.2 on two printers. The memory leak appears to be fixed and I only had one or two errors reading patches, so that is an improvement.</p>
<p>The profiles still have the same yellow-green tint for skin tones which makes them mostly useless for me.</p>
<p>I was thinking I might do some more testing, but I just can&#8217;t justify wasting any more of my time fiddling with this thing. I&#8217;m getting a refund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjnicholls</title>
		<link>http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/05/version-102-of-colormunki-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>bjnicholls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.printerville.net/?p=71#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been working with X-Rite tech support trying to get my dual NEC 2190UXi displays to profile. The application works once after installation and then gets stuck in a perpetual loop of gray samples on any subsequent attempts. X-Rite has provided a registry update that didn&#039;t address the problem. I&#039;m interested to see a 1.0.2 update reported, but the application doesn&#039;t find one when I check for updates. I&#039;m running 1.0.1.179. I&#039;ve been able to profile my notebook (for what that&#039;s worth) and another workstation with different display hardware, but no luck so far with my main workstation. This hardware profiles just fine with X-Rite&#039;s Eye-One Match application.

Thanks for your reports on this topic. I&#039;m looking around to see what other problems users have experienced.

BJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been working with X-Rite tech support trying to get my dual NEC 2190UXi displays to profile. The application works once after installation and then gets stuck in a perpetual loop of gray samples on any subsequent attempts. X-Rite has provided a registry update that didn&#8217;t address the problem. I&#8217;m interested to see a 1.0.2 update reported, but the application doesn&#8217;t find one when I check for updates. I&#8217;m running 1.0.1.179. I&#8217;ve been able to profile my notebook (for what that&#8217;s worth) and another workstation with different display hardware, but no luck so far with my main workstation. This hardware profiles just fine with X-Rite&#8217;s Eye-One Match application.</p>
<p>Thanks for your reports on this topic. I&#8217;m looking around to see what other problems users have experienced.</p>
<p>BJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
