<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First look: Epson&#8217;s new Stylus Photo R2880</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/26/first-look-at-epson-stylus-photo-r2880/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/26/first-look-at-epson-stylus-photo-r2880/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:58:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Mylle</title>
		<link>http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/26/first-look-at-epson-stylus-photo-r2880/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Mylle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.printerville.net/?p=74#comment-550</guid>
		<description>Repalcing the black inkts (to glossy paper), only works with a new cartridge. if I have 40% left, replace the cardridge to matte, it is ok (with matte for 80% filled). But when I then replace back to the glossy cartridge, it refuses and tells me the level is to low to replace (but it indicates teh 40% flled...).
I have installed the latest driver I can find (6.60).
I don&#039;t want to replace my cardridges with 40% inkt left!!

daniel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Repalcing the black inkts (to glossy paper), only works with a new cartridge. if I have 40% left, replace the cardridge to matte, it is ok (with matte for 80% filled). But when I then replace back to the glossy cartridge, it refuses and tells me the level is to low to replace (but it indicates teh 40% flled&#8230;).<br />
I have installed the latest driver I can find (6.60).<br />
I don&#8217;t want to replace my cardridges with 40% inkt left!!</p>
<p>daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/26/first-look-at-epson-stylus-photo-r2880/comment-page-1/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.printerville.net/?p=74#comment-508</guid>
		<description>Hello all,

I&#039;ve just received an email from another r2880 user who has had the ink flushing problem that I reported in post #1 above.
I wanted to report that that early incident is the only one that I have experienced. Also, Epson has never shipped the set of inks that they promised at that time. I called about four months ago and was told that the shipment was in process. Maybe I should call again and inquire about what kind of process its in!

Also, responding to the question above about feeding heavy paper. I use flat sheets of Epson UltraSmooth Fine Art paper (325 g/sm) for my best prints. I have very little depth to my printer shelf so I tried feeding it through the top feed and have had no problem. It does have to travel around a tight curve so another heavy paper, with a coating on it, might start flaking because of the stress.

Finally, regarding the roll paper feed: I have given up! The r2400 roll handling is a dream compared to the r2880. The r2880 seems to be set for printing on pre-cut pieces. I need to be able to do continuous feed of multiple prints to be at all efficient with the (very expensive) paper. I use the r2400 for that.

But, despite all the frustrations, the prints are still gorgeous.

Jake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello all,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just received an email from another r2880 user who has had the ink flushing problem that I reported in post #1 above.<br />
I wanted to report that that early incident is the only one that I have experienced. Also, Epson has never shipped the set of inks that they promised at that time. I called about four months ago and was told that the shipment was in process. Maybe I should call again and inquire about what kind of process its in!</p>
<p>Also, responding to the question above about feeding heavy paper. I use flat sheets of Epson UltraSmooth Fine Art paper (325 g/sm) for my best prints. I have very little depth to my printer shelf so I tried feeding it through the top feed and have had no problem. It does have to travel around a tight curve so another heavy paper, with a coating on it, might start flaking because of the stress.</p>
<p>Finally, regarding the roll paper feed: I have given up! The r2400 roll handling is a dream compared to the r2880. The r2880 seems to be set for printing on pre-cut pieces. I need to be able to do continuous feed of multiple prints to be at all efficient with the (very expensive) paper. I use the r2400 for that.</p>
<p>But, despite all the frustrations, the prints are still gorgeous.</p>
<p>Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/26/first-look-at-epson-stylus-photo-r2880/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.printerville.net/?p=74#comment-497</guid>
		<description>I just bought one of these and for the life of me can&#039;t get it to return the roll paper to printing position after printing an image.

It just keeps spitting out the roll and till it is all gone. I&#039;m hoding down the roll button for 3 seconds as it instructs in the manual.. Am i missing something...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought one of these and for the life of me can&#8217;t get it to return the roll paper to printing position after printing an image.</p>
<p>It just keeps spitting out the roll and till it is all gone. I&#8217;m hoding down the roll button for 3 seconds as it instructs in the manual.. Am i missing something&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick LePage</title>
		<link>http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/26/first-look-at-epson-stylus-photo-r2880/comment-page-1/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick LePage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.printerville.net/?p=74#comment-462</guid>
		<description>You are correct, Paula - on both counts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct, Paula &#8211; on both counts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paula richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/26/first-look-at-epson-stylus-photo-r2880/comment-page-1/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>paula richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.printerville.net/?p=74#comment-461</guid>
		<description>Thank you Rick.

So, the pack of complimentary paper that I received - glossy @ 255gsm &amp; &#039; heavyweight matte&#039; @ 167gsm, is handled by the main paper load mechanism: fine art papers by the secondary rear feed slot: papers 1-1.5mm by the front tray. Does that sound right?

They are not very clear about it are they!

Your help is much appreciated!
regards,
Paula</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Rick.</p>
<p>So, the pack of complimentary paper that I received &#8211; glossy @ 255gsm &amp; &#8216; heavyweight matte&#8217; @ 167gsm, is handled by the main paper load mechanism: fine art papers by the secondary rear feed slot: papers 1-1.5mm by the front tray. Does that sound right?</p>
<p>They are not very clear about it are they!</p>
<p>Your help is much appreciated!<br />
regards,<br />
Paula</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick LePage</title>
		<link>http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/26/first-look-at-epson-stylus-photo-r2880/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick LePage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.printerville.net/?p=74#comment-460</guid>
		<description>Paula:

The front tray is really only for thick media 1mm to 1.5mm thick; it&#039;s not for paper like Velvet Fine Art, Watercolor Radiant White, or any of the other fine-art papers that Epson sells.

Medium thickness paper, like those and most sold by companies like Moab, Red River and others, is handled through the secondary manual feed slot behind the main paper load mechanism.

Epson really isn&#039;t very clear on that.

Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula:</p>
<p>The front tray is really only for thick media 1mm to 1.5mm thick; it&#8217;s not for paper like Velvet Fine Art, Watercolor Radiant White, or any of the other fine-art papers that Epson sells.</p>
<p>Medium thickness paper, like those and most sold by companies like Moab, Red River and others, is handled through the secondary manual feed slot behind the main paper load mechanism.</p>
<p>Epson really isn&#8217;t very clear on that.</p>
<p>Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick LePage</title>
		<link>http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/26/first-look-at-epson-stylus-photo-r2880/comment-page-1/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick LePage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.printerville.net/?p=74#comment-459</guid>
		<description>RD:

I assume you&#039;ve looked at both the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.printerville.net/2008/09/14/epson-stylus-photo-r2880-review/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;R2880&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.printerville.net/2008/04/21/hp-photosmart-pro-b8850-review/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;B8850&lt;/a&gt; reviews here on the site. The B9180 is nearly identical to the B8850: it uses the same inks and paper transport as the B8850, and adds an Ethernet port and support for slightly thicker papers. If you think you like the B8850 over the Epson printers, then you just need to think about those two differences.

If you don&#039;t think you&#039;ll use anything other than stock HP papers for fine art work, then the 0.7mm thickness limit on the B8850 won&#039;t be of too much concern. It&#039;s really for when you want to use extremely thick fine-art papers or poster board where you&#039;ll run into trouble.

Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RD:</p>
<p>I assume you&#8217;ve looked at both the <a href="http://www.printerville.net/2008/09/14/epson-stylus-photo-r2880-review/" rel="nofollow">R2880</a> and <a href="http://www.printerville.net/2008/04/21/hp-photosmart-pro-b8850-review/" rel="nofollow">B8850</a> reviews here on the site. The B9180 is nearly identical to the B8850: it uses the same inks and paper transport as the B8850, and adds an Ethernet port and support for slightly thicker papers. If you think you like the B8850 over the Epson printers, then you just need to think about those two differences.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll use anything other than stock HP papers for fine art work, then the 0.7mm thickness limit on the B8850 won&#8217;t be of too much concern. It&#8217;s really for when you want to use extremely thick fine-art papers or poster board where you&#8217;ll run into trouble.</p>
<p>Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/26/first-look-at-epson-stylus-photo-r2880/comment-page-1/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>RD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.printerville.net/?p=74#comment-457</guid>
		<description>I wanted to know if anyone has done any analysis on the R2880 vs. HP B9180?  I am interested in both printers and have heard great things about both printers.

Thanks,

RD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to know if anyone has done any analysis on the R2880 vs. HP B9180?  I am interested in both printers and have heard great things about both printers.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>RD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paula richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/26/first-look-at-epson-stylus-photo-r2880/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>paula richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.printerville.net/?p=74#comment-454</guid>
		<description>Can anyone tell me what Epson&#039;s definition of &quot;thick paper&quot; is? My R2880 manual tells me I have to load &quot;thick paper&quot; singly, using the special front manual tray. But nowhere do they tell me what they mean by &quot;thick&quot; in terms of gsm/lbs or mm/ins. I do not want to ruin my printer by loading paper which is too thick into the rear paper-feed! Would be grateful to know, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone tell me what Epson&#8217;s definition of &#8220;thick paper&#8221; is? My R2880 manual tells me I have to load &#8220;thick paper&#8221; singly, using the special front manual tray. But nowhere do they tell me what they mean by &#8220;thick&#8221; in terms of gsm/lbs or mm/ins. I do not want to ruin my printer by loading paper which is too thick into the rear paper-feed! Would be grateful to know, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick LePage</title>
		<link>http://www.printerville.net/2008/05/26/first-look-at-epson-stylus-photo-r2880/comment-page-1/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick LePage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.printerville.net/?p=74#comment-444</guid>
		<description>If you put them in a Ziploc-style plastic bag and push as much air out of it, the cartridges will last a couple of months without drying out. A bit longer than that, and you do run the risk of it clogging, but I&#039;ve rarely had a problem. 

Rick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you put them in a Ziploc-style plastic bag and push as much air out of it, the cartridges will last a couple of months without drying out. A bit longer than that, and you do run the risk of it clogging, but I&#8217;ve rarely had a problem. </p>
<p>Rick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

